Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Morality In “Queen Vs. Dudley And Stephens” Essay

1. In the case of Queen vs. Dudley and Stephens, was the killing of the cabin boy, Richard Parker, morally malign? Relate your answer to one or more of the following respectable theories Aristotelian moral philosophy, Hobbesian ethics, Utilitarianism, or Kantian ethics. Be sure to give a summary of the main expresss of the theory, as well as drawing stunned its implications for the case.In the case of Dudley and Stephens, the execute of Richard Parker derrierenot be justified as macrocosm morally permissible. Our society functions on certain base principles, one of them be that there atomic number 18 some things which are forbidden, that particular actions or measures can never be correct due to their nature. Murder is an action which qualifies as being fundamentally wrong, it can never be said that murder is the serious thing to do, because no matter the context, murder is in no way a morally permissible course of action.While it is accepted that all of the crew members would most certainly have died if Parker had not been slain, that is however not enough reason to have permitted the murder. Even if the boy had been consulted on the matter and he had subsequently granted his consent, the act of murder politic cannot be justified. There is no situation so dire (excluding state of war and self-defense) to warrant the voluntary taking of another human beings life. Although the crew had already gone numerous days without any bring in of nourishment, murder was still not the proper course of action. The boy was unspoiled death, and perhaps if they had waited just another day he would have died naturally, and accordingly they could have used his body.This standpoint of murder never being the right decision is supported by Aristotles theory of virtue ethics. His theory states that we should live our lives according to principles of virtue and morality, and this will lead to an science of happiness. Aristotle says that not all of our actions should be virtuous, as an extreme amount of anything wint bring happiness, but rather we should live to a take to be between evil and morality. He believes that through our ability to reason and subscribe our actions we will reach that mean position and balance our lives to a point of happiness. While the theory does allow us to choose some actions which are not moral

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.