Friday, March 15, 2019
Informative Speech For Gun Ownership :: essays research papers
Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of the citizen to keep and rotate arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very c befully apply and that definite rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of the citizen to adopt arms is just one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible. -Hubert Humphrey, 1960 My background is probably atypical for a clean high-profile star of the right to keep and expatriate arms. I am black and grew up in Manhattans East Harlem, far removed from the great American gun culture of rural, white America. Although my voting patterns have become somewhat more conservative in recent years, I remain in my heart of hearts a 1960s Humphrey Democrat concerned with the engage of those most vulnerable in American society-minorities, the poor, the elderly, and single women-groups whose day-to-day realities are oftentimes overlooked in our public policy debates, people whose lives in addition often go unnoticed by our aptly timid chattering classes. This is happening in the public debate over the right to bear arms. For the nations elites, the Second Amendment has become the Rodney Dangerfield of the Bill of Rights, constantly attacked by editorial writers, police chiefs seeking scapegoats, demagoging politicians, and most recently level off by Rosie ODonnell, no less. It is threatened by opportunistic legislative efforts, even when sponsors acknowledge their proposed legislation would have little impact on umbrage and violence. Professional champions of civil rights and civil liberties have been unwilling to defend the implicit in(p) principle of the right to arms. Even the conservative defense has been timid and often inept, tied less, one suspects, to abiding principle and more to the dynamics of modern-day Republican politics. Thus a right older than the Republic, one that the drafters of two constitutional amendments the Second and the Fourteenth intended to protect, and a right whose scathing importance has been painfully revealed by twentieth-century history, is left undefended by the lawyers, writers, and scholars we routinely expect to defend other constitutional rights. Instead, the Second Amendments intellectual as well as political defense has been left in the unlikely hands of the National Rifle Association (NRA). And although the NRA deserves considerably transgress than the demonized reputation it has acquired, it should not be the sole or even champion voice in defense of a major constitutional provision.